Wierd-Fish wrote:
That's true but you mean only YOUR hole card right. it would be a nonsense to be able to see the other's card when they don't show them.
Yes of course. Wanting to see opponent's non-showdown hands would be silly. (Mucked showdown hands on the other hand should be shown in the hand history, because it's within the rules to get to see them if you ask)
Also if you really want to analyse your game, you can take a sheet of paper, a pen and write every hand you folded and that could be interesting. ( no need for example to write that you folded 7 3 under the gun )
Sure, but just a bit too much trouble in play-money games. Why not just to put them in hand history automagically?
I don't see the point of multi-tabling in play-money poker. The capacity of multi-tabling is a good skill when you play poker to win money, otherwise it is also a nonsense as it implied that you don't play your best poker.
I don't agree. I only play heads ups here, and i'd rather play 2 tables of heads-ups at once. Against the same opponent if he is willing. If not, then another. Reasons are related to keeping the thinking times the same not to give out timing tells. Unfortunately that slows down the game, so its general practice to play 2 tables, or even more.
You looks motivated enough to work hard to improve your game. Here again, you can write the game you've played with how many player player on a sheet of paper or in your computer.
Doing that, but I'd prefer server managed statistics. Simpler, and adds a nice competition aspect that works a bit like putting some money in a pot.
Here if you want to compete with stats you are limited to "ranked games". I prefer to play mostly heads ups (or 6max cash games), and because here you can't ban non-serious players and no real money involved, many players just go all in within the first few hands. In heads ups you can just abort the game and get another opponent, but donkaments get silly and don't resemble much real games (dunno about freerolls, tho. Never played them).