Just a quick reply.
The code you provided has nothing to do with assigning the real hands.
It just provides the random distribution of numbers on interval, that are then transformed to the cards. I have tested that distribution and there is nothing wrong with it as i have reported. But there is no actual assignment of hands there? I have found that in completely another part and there should be a real catch ....
How can i know what kind of server are you running? I supposed you had modified the code to be able to transform the results?

And i finally got a response, thanks.

Cheers, filer.

Sorry filer, even if i got really usefull comments from you in the past, i have to agree with doitux. Let´s calm down and help us the way doitux showed to you.

We at Poker-Heroes.com also arrange ourselfs with PokerTH and team up with them and they do the same with us. That´s the way we can step forward.

Concerning assignment of hands check

tools.cpp line 55
void Tools::ShuffleArrayNonDeterministic(int *inout, unsigned count)

and

localhand.cpp line 56

LuisCypher wrote:
Hi LuisCypher.

Let me start for saying that i respect, and admire in 200 % the work and the effort that both, PokerTh and PokerHeroes put in here to provide us enjoyable poker nights.
I do understand that both teams have more important tasks to deal at the moment and time is short and days even shorter.

But realy makes me sick see win me?? at the top yesterday, in second, Nelly in third, jester411, *DamnRiver*, Filmore, Groucho Marx, a endless list, having theyr score and position affected just because they will keep playing like they should, while some just come here 1 day every 3 months.



LuisCypher wrote :

Yes, please, i did'nt ment to start a war. hehehe



LuisCypher wrote :

And thats the way it suppose to be Luis.
But don't forget a important thing.The pokerth comunity also.
It's in our best interest to report bugs, give sugestions, and make criticism in a constructive way at both teams.
So i hope my criticism can help us to give that step forward we all wish, for the upcoming seasons.
And if with my post i prevented and made blush some of the players that have this bad and unethical behavior of doing 20 games in 20 hours just with the porpose of getting good positions, i consider it 2 steps forward and not a totally waiste of time.
So please don't consider my post as a bad critical, because is not my intention at all.


Ps: Another suggestion for the ranking system for upcoming seasons:
1 season = 3 months = 90 days = Placements points divided for ALL the games played in a season. Less than 80 games gets a penaltie of 50% in score. 80 games gives less than 1 game for day so i think it's reasonable for all.
And it's very challenging, if for example we have a average of 14.5, we have to reach at least the 2th place in the next game if we want to improve that average.
If we have bad runs at the beggining, there is always the next season to get better. The beta 4 was in my opinion the more challenging season by the system implemented at that time.
And finally, would prevented also, with the penaltie score, the ranking reachers and award the poker players.

Kind regards from a person that enjoys Pokerth

YuGo

We will discuss this at our annual PokerTH/Poker-Heroes.com at the 19.05.2012. In my opinion we should do some small modifications at the current system just to make it a bit more fair.

Fact is, that this system is a discontinued model, which has to be switched to something like elo asap. Nevertheless for meanwhile we should do some mods. I´m sure that also the others in the team have a similarly point of view. I keep you posted.

Thank you very much Luis