Topic-icon formula de puntuacion

More
13 Jun 2020 10:48 #46842 by malasyerbas
malasyerbas created the topic: formula de puntuacion
hola a todos.

miedo me da hacer esta pregunta...
creo que es algo complicado de entender, pero me gustaria entenderlo sin tener que doctorarme en matematicas.
como puedo quedar 4º, ganar 4 puntos, y bajar 2 puestos en el ranking ?????
ahora empiezo comprender a los fisicos que dicen que 2+2 no siempre son 4

gracias por soportar este ignorante

Hello everyone.

I am afraid to ask this question ...
I think it is difficult to understand, but I would like to understand it without having to do a PhD in mathematics.
How can I be 4th, earn 4 points, and go down 2 places in the ranking ?????
Now I begin to understand the physicists who say that 2 + 2 is not always 4

thanks for putting up with this ignorant

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
13 Jun 2020 18:34 #46843 by sp0ck
sp0ck replied.
hola RedHat guy,

what exactly are you talking about?

A game about luck - and you complain about bad luck - searching for a specific reason in the engines - comparing PokerTH with pokerstars?

Please calm down and maybe play better?

It is really ridiculous.

Kind regards

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
13 Jun 2020 20:02 #46844 by malasyerbas
malasyerbas replied.
hola spock.
pues hablo exactamente de lo que dice el titulo del post. la forma de puntuar
y creo que no me estas interpretando bien o leido bien...
no protesto por no ganar. protesto por la forma que tiene el programa de hacerme perder.
pero esta cuestion de ganar o perder la dejo para la seccion de bugs.
en esta ocasion reitero mi pregunta...como puedo ganar 4 puntos y bajar en el rankig 2 puestos?
estoy muy calmado spock, de hecho vengo ahora mismo de jugar en zingapoker, he ganado 300 B Billones con B en fichas gracias a los graciosos algoritmos de estos programas, pero me he divertido porque he jugado...si, jugado, y con poker th solo aspiro a quedar 2º o 3º o 4º poniendome en ausente, porque mi unica aspiracion es puntuar y subir en el rankig sin quedar el 1º porque es bastante complicado para un inepto del poker como yo.
mi ilusion con este programa es ponerme en ausente y puntuar lo que pueda, pero...que alguien me explique porque sumando 4 puntos bajo dos puestos en el ranking.
y es bastante curioso que segun aumentamos partidas, las posibilidades de ganar alguna vez bajan exponencialmente como por arte de magia. para muestra a ver cuantos jugadores entre los 50 primeros tienen mas de 350 partidas jugadas
saludos cordiales

hello spock.
Well I speak exactly what the title of the post says. how to score
and I think you are not interpreting me well or reading me well ...
I do not protest not to win. I protest the way the program has to make me lose.
But this issue of winning or losing is left to the bug section.
this time I reiterate my question ... how can I earn 4 points and go down in rankig 2 places?
I am very calm spock, in fact I come right now from playing in zingapoker, I have won 300 B Billions with B in chips thanks to the funny algorithms of these programs, but I had fun because I have played ... yes, played, and with poker I only aspire to be 2nd or 3rd or 4th, absent myself, because my only aspiration is to score and go up in rank without being 1st because it is quite complicated for a poker inept like me.
my hope with this program is to be absent and score what I can, but ... someone explain to me because adding 4 points under two positions in the ranking.
and it is quite curious that as we increase games, the chances of winning ever decrease exponentially as if by magic. to show how many players in the top 50 have more than 350 games played
best regards

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
13 Jun 2020 20:06 #46845 by sp0ck
sp0ck replied.

how can I earn 4 points and go down in rankig 2 places?


Well - you are not willing to check some math stuff with the formular - I cannot help there.

I'm just questioning your subjective point of view showing "proofs" that just do not say anything.

It is really weird dude.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
13 Jun 2020 20:23 #46846 by malasyerbas
malasyerbas replied.
pues mi punto de vista subjetivo, resulta ser la comidilla del chat en las partidas normales, porque no soy yo solo el raro en esto, resulta haber muchos mas, pero que no dicen nada, sera por no molestar.
y esos muchos mas tambien hacen como yo ponerse en ausente a ver como termina la cosa.
a mi lo que si empieza a preocuparme, es esta defensa ferrea que haceis por el buen funcionamiento de un programa que le demuestra a cientos de jugadores lo contrario a un buen funcionamiento
ya he visto muchos otros hilos sobre el "buen" comportamiendo del algoritmo en este foro, sabemos los dos que no soy el unico que lo comenta.
bueno pues podeis seguir defendiendo, no cambies nada ni toqueis nada, esta perfecto para que se ilusionen 200 o 300 iniciados, pero unos entran y otros salen. es cuestion de numeros y sin formulas cuanticas
Well, my subjective point of view, turns out to be the talk of chat in normal games, because I am not the only one who is weird in this, it turns out that there are many more, but they do not say anything, it will be for not disturbing.
and those many more also do like me to get away to see how things end.
what if I start to worry, is this iron defense that you do for the proper functioning of a program that shows hundreds of players the opposite of a good performance
I have already seen many other threads about the "good" behavior of the algorithm in this forum, we both know that I am not the only one commenting on it.
Well, you can continue defending, do not change anything or touch anything, it is perfect for 200 or 300 initiates to get excited, but some enter and others leave. it's a matter of numbers and without quantum formulas

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
13 Jun 2020 20:26 #46847 by sp0ck
sp0ck replied.
Ah ... now I get it. Thx for your amusing point of view.

If you have a real real proof - beside subjectiveness, feel free to let us know.
The following user(s) said Thank You: boehmi

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Champions of

PokerTH - live

The PokerTH spectator tool.

Member Login

 advert
NOTE! This site uses cookies and similar technologies.
Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information

We use cookies to personalize content and ads to offer features for social media and analyze the number of hits on our website. We also provide information about your use of our website to our partner for social media, advertising and analysis on.
http://www.google.com/intl/de/policies/privacy/partners/